thats down to agility... this would be down to skill and attention to detail
Lol...either way im f**k*d!!!
Passable?
- Thread starter Rossi46
- Start date
Lol...either way im f**k*d!!!
JessThePlasterer
Queen Jess Elizabeth I
Hats off and kudos to renderers from me! I wouldn’t have the balls..... or knowledge or skill.
If I did do it though I’d have something in writing about which/all lighting to avoid
If I did do it though I’d have something in writing about which/all lighting to avoid
Danny
-
As ever I am playing devils advocate
vfr12
MOTORC*NT
I had enough really!oh look my picture... look this .... look that! It’s a f**k**g picture and does no justice ! Have said it 100 times on here! f**k**g amateurs! Shine the f**k**g appolo underneath if you want to check your work or any led. Makes it 100 worse than them piss taking lights that show only section of the render. It’s all acceptable if you got paid! No skimmer can do render like this, but then I can’t skim like them !
essexandy
The Lake Governor
What a f**k**g stupid thing to say on here on an open forum.You say that but quite a few renderer can do it and shine lights up them no bother....so I think that is a bench mark?
Personally I doubt if I could but that is not the point
It's c**ts like you that become know nothing site agents going around shining lights and tugging people's work.
The benchmark is quite clearly set out in the British Standards and NHBC guidelines.
We've just had a thread about lights and angles on internal work and now this. It's ridiculous.
zolco
Private Member
bprenderingservicesltd
Active Member
totally agree you here all the skimmers complaining and rightly so when site agents check there work with a light down the side,this shits on a lot heavier and we do our best to leave the best finish we can then some t**t puts a permanent light on there work and expect it to be flawless!a couple of photos of work looking good with lights up dosnt tell the full story
bprenderingservicesltd
Active Member
what you will get with glancing light is you can see who has made an effort and who hasnt
vfr12
MOTORC*NT
Extra, extra effort that you shouldn't by the way
Vincey
Private Member
Evening mate so what are you saying here , do you mean it should look absolutely perfect with some of these modern up and down lights ?
Vincey
Private Member
I’ve discussed this topic at great lengths with a lot of experienced renderers,
If I’m correct even parex and Weber do not have in writing a standard as such that is for testing such situations of exterior lighting they only have brief description in natural daylight as what is acceptable as such
If I’m correct even parex and Weber do not have in writing a standard as such that is for testing such situations of exterior lighting they only have brief description in natural daylight as what is acceptable as such
vfr12
MOTORC*NT
No mate, that’s not the standard by any means! You put a job like this only cos you have went the extra mile , which no one should expect from you! These lights make an mm look like a mile . No one should put or be allowed to put such a pressure - manufacturer or customer , doesn’t matter! This is not the standard and can’t be achieved constantly!
We should relax a bit more and have a life instead of chasing some standards shown on picture , which doesn’t do justice! That’s my opinion mate!
CeeVee
Well-Known Member
Get ready for tomorrow mate...you wont believe how f**k*d up this gable will look when the suns on it...
The Hobo
Well-Known Member
but only for a short while
vfr12
MOTORC*NT
Great! John is joining you right?