Lath and plaster ceiling fix options?

Members online

Status
Not open for further replies.

Heneage

New Member
Hi all,

Been reading the forum for a while to help with various plans over the past year or so - so thanks for all the info. By way of intro I'm working through a refurb of a new-to-me 1930's semi. Bit of a DIYer for some things but try to know my limits.

I have a dilemma with my lath and plaster ceilings and I'd like to ask for some advice so I can make a decision. All the ceilings are covered in lining paper and I know this has been put up to cover cracking etc.

As I refurb the place I want a better fix than lining paper but am struggling to decide what to do already in room 1. I've taken some photos of the ceiling so far. I would say there are hairline cracks all over (like photo 2 and 3), a couple of more established wall to wall cracks (photo 4) and loose areas around the edges and some quite bad in the corners (photo 1). In the main the ceiling seems 'okay' - still sound in large parts but the nibs in the loft are very brittle (been in loft).

I don't think a re-skim will work very well and I don't want it overboarded. I am tending toward pull down and reboard but wonder whether a skim with reinforcing mesh might provide a reasonably decent fix? or is there any other options?

Comments gratefully received thanks!
 

Attachments

  • Crack 1.jpg
    Crack 1.jpg
    375.2 KB · Views: 1,526
  • Crack 2.jpg
    Crack 2.jpg
    366.9 KB · Views: 1,330
  • Crack 3.jpg
    Crack 3.jpg
    391.1 KB · Views: 1,134
  • Crack 4.jpg
    Crack 4.jpg
    363 KB · Views: 1,050
Depends on how well it's attached hanging more weight off it mesh or no mesh ain't gonna help if it's defying gravity as it is. Best you can do is get a spread in for opinion and a price . Looking at pics is a guessing game.
 
Pull down and reboard. I never skim over cracked or damage lath and plaster. Lots of dust musks will be needed!! Or order a new pair of lungs once you've finished.
 
As above.
If you have cornice then finish the boards around 10-25 mm short of the cornice this then looks perfectly normal when painted.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Okay thanks. I suppose I wanted to double check there was no magic fix... I have taken cornice off already - it wasn't original and wasn't fixed very well. Not bad on the walls but on the ceiling it came off very easy in long lengths, mainly sticking to old paint I think. I will be having more put up so again I think a good reason to have the ceiling fixed properly first time.

My reluctance for boarding over is for the weight - 23kg per board plus skim on my poor old loft joists. Tempting though.

Thanks for the comments.
 
[QUOTE="Heneage, post: 933277, member: 27024"

My reluctance for boarding over is for the weight - 23kg per board plus skim on my poor old loft joists. Tempting though.

Thanks for the comments.[/QUOTE]

we overboard all the time without any problems,
if you are that concerned then use british gypsum glasroc F board, a fibre glass, light weight board. to which you can apply a skimcoat. a special order from your builders merchant.
 
Was just going to say - its mainly the weight that that I'm not keen on. Will have a look at the F board and also the wire/washer suggestion.
 
Unless your joists are shot or ridiculously thin it'll be fine. Or at the very most knock off the plaster and leave the paths on provided they are butt jointed

Sent from my GT-I9195 using Tapatalk
 
Weight IS an issue overboarding a bedroom ceiling.

The joists are much smaller than ground floor ceilings as they're designed to hold a ceiling up not carry a load. The weight of anything in the loft, and the weight of the existing ceiling material and then add a quarter of a tonne dry weight that you're adding in boards and skim. All hanging on three by two and a half inch joists.

The ceiling is likely to be bowed anyway. What do you suppose will happen when you hang an additional quarter of a tonne off it? :eek:
 
i am yet to see any overboarded ceiling fail because of the extra weight .
as beddy states if the joists are in that poor of condition then a new roof is required as it will not stand the weight of the tiles/slates and a decent fall of snow.
 
i am yet to see any overboarded ceiling fail because of the extra weight .
as beddy states if the joists are in that poor of condition then a new roof is required as it will not stand the weight of the tiles/slates and a decent fall of snow.

What's the roof got to do with it? Roof joists and purlins have nothing to do with the load on ceiling joists.

The first floor ceiling joists in a normal construction have one purpose, to carry the ceiling. If you double the weight of the ceiling you don't need to be a structural engineer to work out that you've exceeded the design load.

As for never seeing one fail, if you mean collapse then probably not. If you mean bow due to the weight increase then I haven't seen one that hasn't.

As mentioned in many other threads, you can get away with many short cuts and bodges. Or you can do the job properly. The choices and advantages/disadvantages should always be explained to the customer. If they choose the less desirable method then you accept that but put in writing the possible outcomes. If you don't then you can do the job, take the money and ride off into the sunset on your horse.
 
Weight IS an issue overboarding a bedroom ceiling.

The joists are much smaller than ground floor ceilings as they're designed to hold a ceiling up not carry a load. The weight of anything in the loft, and the weight of the existing ceiling material and then add a quarter of a tonne dry weight that you're adding in boards and skim. All hanging on three by two and a half inch joists.

The ceiling is likely to be bowed anyway. What do you suppose will happen when you hang an additional quarter of a tonne off it? :eek:
Lol
Overboard all day long
 
Hi all,

Been reading the forum for a while to help with various plans over the past year or so - so thanks for all the info. By way of intro I'm working through a refurb of a new-to-me 1930's semi. Bit of a DIYer for some things but try to know my limits.

I have a dilemma with my lath and plaster ceilings and I'd like to ask for some advice so I can make a decision. All the ceilings are covered in lining paper and I know this has been put up to cover cracking etc.

As I refurb the place I want a better fix than lining paper but am struggling to decide what to do already in room 1. I've taken some photos of the ceiling so far. I would say there are hairline cracks all over (like photo 2 and 3), a couple of more established wall to wall cracks (photo 4) and loose areas around the edges and some quite bad in the corners (photo 1). In the main the ceiling seems 'okay' - still sound in large parts but the nibs in the loft are very brittle (been in loft).

I don't think a re-skim will work very well and I don't want it overboarded. I am tending toward pull down and reboard but wonder whether a skim with reinforcing mesh might provide a reasonably decent fix? or is there any other options?

Comments gratefully received thanks!
Overboard and skim , all the concern about weight is just over analysing a simple plastering job.
Lets say you got a plasterer do it for £### job done...start kicking down the ceiling and getting rid of waste will double the cost and is a total waste of time and money.
 
Overboard and skim , all the concern about weight is just over analysing a simple plastering job.
Lets say you got a plasterer do it for £### job done...start kicking down the ceiling and getting rid of waste will double the cost and is a total waste of time and money.

It's not the job that's simple.

If you don't know what you're doing leave it alone, and clearly with all the nonsense about roof joists and weight not being an issue then quite a few haven't a clue.

This link gives you the spans and loads for C16 graded timber. http://www.bsw.co.uk/uploads/files/bsw_timber_c16_span_leaflet_a4_4pp240810.pdf Of course I'm sure as it's a simple plastering job you'll realise that not all the ceiling joists will be graded. It also won't matter that if you double the load you need to increase the support.

I guess that's the problem with builders being jack of all trades rather than experts in one field. It means that builders actually have a clue what goes on behind the bit they're working on while the trade specialists carry on regardless without a fcuking clue.
 
It's not the job that's simple.

If you don't know what you're doing leave it alone, and clearly with all the nonsense about roof joists and weight not being an issue then quite a few haven't a clue.

This link gives you the spans and loads for C16 graded timber. http://www.bsw.co.uk/uploads/files/bsw_timber_c16_span_leaflet_a4_4pp240810.pdf Of course I'm sure as it's a simple plastering job you'll realise that not all the ceiling joists will be graded. It also won't matter that if you double the load you need to increase the support.

I guess that's the problem with builders being jack of all trades rather than experts in one field. It means that builders actually have a clue what goes on behind the bit they're working on while the trade specialists carry on regardless without a fcuking clue.
This forum just gets better every day
 
It's not the job that's simple.

If you don't know what you're doing leave it alone, and clearly with all the nonsense about roof joists and weight not being an issue then quite a few haven't a clue.

This link gives you the spans and loads for C16 graded timber. http://www.bsw.co.uk/uploads/files/bsw_timber_c16_span_leaflet_a4_4pp240810.pdf Of course I'm sure as it's a simple plastering job you'll realise that not all the ceiling joists will be graded. It also won't matter that if you double the load you need to increase the support.

I guess that's the problem with builders being jack of all trades rather than experts in one field. It means that builders actually have a clue what goes on behind the bit they're working on while the trade specialists carry on regardless without a fcuking clue.
Sorry to disagree but I do I haven't read the link u put up but the room looks like a simple board and skim new boards aren't going to make the house fall down
Sorry if anyone took what I said in the builder thread the wrong way it's just how I see it

God this weekend's turning into pick on Vince weekend.
 
Hi all,

Been reading the forum for a while to help with various plans over the past year or so - so thanks for all the info. By way of intro I'm working through a refurb of a new-to-me 1930's semi. Bit of a DIYer for some things but try to know my limits.

I have a dilemma with my lath and plaster ceilings and I'd like to ask for some advice so I can make a decision. All the ceilings are covered in lining paper and I know this has been put up to cover cracking etc.

As I refurb the place I want a better fix than lining paper but am struggling to decide what to do already in room 1. I've taken some photos of the ceiling so far. I would say there are hairline cracks all over (like photo 2 and 3), a couple of more established wall to wall cracks (photo 4) and loose areas around the edges and some quite bad in the corners (photo 1). In the main the ceiling seems 'okay' - still sound in large parts but the nibs in the loft are very brittle (been in loft).

I don't think a re-skim will work very well and I don't want it overboarded. I am tending toward pull down and reboard but wonder whether a skim with reinforcing mesh might provide a reasonably decent fix? or is there any other options?

Comments gratefully received thanks!
Hi pal can you standin the corner of your rooms take a picture of the whole ceiling and 2 more in the opposite corners of the walls
 
Sorry to disagree but I do I haven't read the link u put up but the room looks like a simple board and skim new boards aren't going to make the house fall down

So you haven't bothered to read the information that proves your thoughts wrong, but you want to carry on with them. I guess facts are an inconvenience. No one mentioned anything about the house falling down, or even the ceiling falling down. Still, if your wrong I guess dramatic statements help to deflect attention.

This forum just gets better every day

I know, sometimes it's hard to believe.
 
It's not the job that's simple.

If you don't know what you're doing leave it alone, and clearly with all the nonsense about roof joists and weight not being an issue then quite a few haven't a clue.

This link gives you the spans and loads for C16 graded timber. http://www.bsw.co.uk/uploads/files/bsw_timber_c16_span_leaflet_a4_4pp240810.pdf Of course I'm sure as it's a simple plastering job you'll realise that not all the ceiling joists will be graded. It also won't matter that if you double the load you need to increase the support.

I guess that's the problem with builders being jack of all trades rather than experts in one field. It means that builders actually have a clue what goes on behind the bit they're working on while the trade specialists carry on regardless without a fcuking clue.

How would you go about reinforcing the timbers? Or would you just pull the ceiling down and board?
 
So you haven't bothered to read the information that proves your thoughts wrong, but you want to carry on with them. I guess facts are an inconvenience. No one mentioned anything about the house falling down, or even the ceiling falling down. Still, if your wrong I guess dramatic statements help to deflect attention.



I know, sometimes it's hard to believe.
Okay I not be dramatic just say as I see.

I asked him for room photos because if that is a 1930s ex council house in my opinion it just board and skim
 
Fu cking ell a plasterboard is spread over 2.88 sqm , using 50/75 mm drywall screws , nothing is gonna happen
 
How would you go about reinforcing the timbers? Or would you just pull the ceiling down and board?

Pull the old one down and board, it's rarely cheaper or easier to strengthen the timbers. If the customer doesn't want to pay for that then either do it under their acceptance of responsibility or say thanks but no thanks.
 
What's the roof got to do with it? Roof joists and purlins have nothing to do with the load on ceiling joists.

The first floor ceiling joists in a normal construction have one purpose, to carry the ceiling. If you double the weight of the ceiling you don't need to be a structural engineer to work out that you've exceeded the design load.

As for never seeing one fail, if you mean collapse then probably not. If you mean bow due to the weight increase then I haven't seen one that hasn't.

As mentioned in many other threads, you can get away with many short cuts and bodges. Or you can do the job properly. The choices and advantages/disadvantages should always be explained to the customer. If they choose the less desirable method then you accept that but put in writing the possible outcomes. If you don't then you can do the job, take the money and ride off into the sunset on your horse.


the roof is made up of a group of trusses, weather it is a cut roof or a truss put together under pressure in a factory.

i have never seen a ceiling collapse nor go out of shape owing to overboarding.

remember you are an office boy not a practical person.
 
Fu cking ell a plasterboard is spread over 2.88 sqm , using 50/75 mm drywall screws , nothing is gonna happen

Yeah? It's not a dynamic or point load so ntohing dramatic like the ceiling collapsing is very likely.

However an additional 250 kg + dead load will cause the ceiling to sag. It's the same weight increase as putting a motorbike in the loft, or 10 25 litre tubs full of water.
 
Yeah? It's not a dynamic or point load so ntohing dramatic like the ceiling collapsing is very likely.

However an additional 250 kg + dead load will cause the ceiling to sag. It's the same weight increase as putting a motorbike in the loft, or 10 25 litre tubs full of water.
How would you get a motorbike in your loft?
 
the roof is made up of a group of trusses, weather it is a cut roof or a truss put together under pressure in a factory.

i have never seen a ceiling collapse nor go out of shape owing to overboarding.

remember you are an office boy not a practical person.

Well whatever you do for a living it clearly has nothing to do with understanding structure or loads. I'm not even going to explain why your first sentence is completely irellevant. Your second one either means you don't look or you don't get invited back.

Office boy? Am I making you feel insecure? Never mind, just try not to be so jealous, not everyone is cut out for the more technical side of things.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top